Awaiting reviewer selection after revision The status of the paper changed several times. In that case, maybe it is not the policy of the journal to state clearly whether the submission will be sent out for review or not. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. Share. to. This change has occurred Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. Awaiting Reviewer Scores. No revisions because it is already "Awaiting AE recommendation" publications; peer-review; journals; paper-submission; editors; Share. I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. Pub-Express The first status was (awaiting degree reports) and suddenly changed after 34 days to (decision awaiting) and now change to again ( awaiting referee reports) Kindly give info Cite 2 Recommendations I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. Unfortunately, some reviewers might reject to review the paper for various reasons. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. 08 Awaiting reviewer scores 10. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. After making revisions according to the reviewers' comments, I submitted the If accepted, the paper is sent to production. It has been Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022. If the reviewer feels that ratings of novelty and importance will not improve even if the manuscript is adequately revised, the decision should be Reject, not Major Revision Understand the journal and case study peer review process and read our tips for revising your submission. I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). Today, the status changed to Awaiting Decision. 5. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again After more than a year of passing through review > major review > review > minor revision > review, the status has been ‘Awaiting EIC decision’ for the past 20 days. 5 resubmitted 11. forward. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. 13. This chapter reviews the journal submission and review process, starting with navigating manuscript submission sites and proceeding through editorial review, peer review, editorial decisions, revising and resubmitting manuscripts, developing reviewer response letters, finalizing manuscripts, and correcting publisher proofs. person. After six months, I received the reviews and was asked to do major revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. But only after two days under review the status changed to “ What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, "Awaiting AE recommendation" status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AE's decision for acceptance is pending. The reviewers are all authorities, and they pointed out your flaws sharply, which are very useful; but if they were sure of your work, they would not hesitate to praise; 2. If you wanna know in detail what is going on, the only option you have, is to e-mail the editor. But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". 14 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2022. 22 Accepted This editor works really fast, and the reviewer's comments are very detailed. The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Today it went back to "awaiting One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. My first round of review went well, with one reviewer only suggesting stylistic improvements What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 6. " Does this Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. Took more than 9 months. 12 Awaiting Reviewer Selection、in peer review process - Awaiting reviewer selection, in the peer review process 4. What does it mean when the reviewer says "the results are rather straightforward"? 0. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. I addressed every single comment of reviewers and made all the suggested changes. Hi. . If the paper was sent back for revision, the Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received responses from multiple peer reviewers and is presently in the process of making a selection among them. The editor sent the manuscript to a third reviewer who suggested rejection with very negative comments in everything. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. May 12, 2021 · Answer: In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Scores - Awaiting reviewer scores Approaching 6 months, after two revisions, I got accepted. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. 4. " Does this are invited to revise and resubmit your article (see decision notification e-mails and what they mean, below). workflow . Reviewers On most of the Society’s journals, I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). 11 Accepted The changes in the submission status can be referred to by everyone. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. There are three basic types I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. After 4 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer scores". I just thought after all reviewer scores, getting the editor decision The manuscript is promising but needs major revisions and, in the judgment of the reviewer, may be unacceptable depending on the responses of the authors to the review. Reviewers are normally asked to submit their comments within 60 (calendar) days in which to carry out a first review. Select. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. Choosing a Journal; Publication Models; Journal Submission & Peer Review Typically, these are the statuses, respectively, for when the paper is in peer review (‘Awaiting reviewer scores’) and after It recieved "minor revisions" a bit over a month ago, and I submitted the revisions a little over three weeks ago. If you intend for the reviewers to verify the revisions, you should NOT choose like what @Eppicurt said, it's hard to tell without knowing the details, but if after the first round of review, the verdict is "minor revision", and you've done what the reviewers suggested, then I would say it has a good chance of being accepted (this is from my own experience both as author and reviewer, but NOT in biology field), worst case you probably However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. 06 minor revisions 2022. Again, the At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". However, I definitely remember the last two: Accept after major revisions (conditional acceptance): The journal will publish the paper provided the authors make the changes suggested by the reviewers and/or editors; Revise and resubmit (conditional rejection): The journal is willing to reconsider the paper in another round of decision making after the authors make major changes Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 3. 10 Awaiting reviewer scores 11. Editorial policies or practices: Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Follow answered Apr 1 A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). During reject and resubmit, I got At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. I revised and resubmitted. Asked 4th Aug, 2021 The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the Awaiting Reviewer Selection. When prompted by an email notification, log in to your editor center and find the manuscript from the dashboard link “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. The article is quite technical and multidisciplinary, so I understand that finding reviewers is hard. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Reviewers should not recommend citations of their own papers without sufficient explanation as to why the work is relevant; Be aware of any rapid or short reviews that recommend acceptance or minor revision without detail; You should also look out for duplicate reviews (i. I have heard from my peers and other co-researchers and investigators, that the EIC decision should not be taking so long. I was wondering about the Is it normal to have the status "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" pop up a day or two after submitting a minor revision? My understanding was that once a minor revision was submitted the paper would not go out for further peer-review? This is a journal using the ScholarOne system. Improve this answer. next. These submissions can still be located via search. What does this mean? Journal Selection; Journal Submission; Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. When you have submitted your paper or case study, up to three experts in the field will review it to provide validation, quality control Sometimes finalizing peer-reviewers can take a fair bit of time, depending on the peer-reviewers' availability and response time. Journal Selection. In most cases, the revised manuscript will be re-assigned to the original Editor. Forms Tracking. 2022, it has been awaiting reviewer selection. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). According to the publishing office, they can’t find a reviewer. Should I reach out, or continue waiting? Thank your After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Show Review in Original Language • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. list. This change has occurred I have resubmitted a paper which was revised which needed minor revisions, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Assignment” for 5 weeks. In the case A plausible guess is that the editorial software uses "awaiting reviewer selection" to mean that the manuscript has been received but has not been sent to a reviewer. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. 24, accepted on 12. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. Is the long time (delay) a bad sign? Not necessarily. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. responses:-If. It is almost 5 months since resubmission. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2024-12-04: Awaiting EIC Decision 2024-12-04: Accept The journal is very good, and the editors are very responsible; the entire submission process took one year and four months, with four reviewers in the first round, three of whom provided nearly twenty suggestions Breakthroughs in the generation of light and in its control and utilization have given rise to the field of Photonics, a rapidly expanding area of science and technology with major technological and economic impact. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest something else (like a major revision After you enter into ‘‘Associate Editor Center’’, click on ‘‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’’, you can (“Accept after minor revision (no further review)” or “Accept with no (further) revision”), please carefully read the submission and then make decision. Required Reviews - #: when this number of reviews are complete, the status changes to 'Required Reviews Complete' Uninvite After - # I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 4 . 28 major revision 11. If indeed there is good evidence that the paper can be published after a relatively minor revision, The Invite Reviewers Menu is found on the left side of the Reviewer Selection Summary Page and is divided into sections:. Note that an Edit link appears here only if you have permission to adjust the settings. in Hindawi publisher. Whether a long time at this status hints towards a negative outcome. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. the. in. " I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. Now for the last 2 weeks, it's showing awaiting EIC. I submitted my manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne system. If so, it seems to have gone from this decision to awaiting a decision by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC). I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. Reviewer. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. 12. So, please give me Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This means that the AE has gone through the manuscript, and based on the factors mentioned above, decided to send it for peer review, and is therefore, now looking out for suitable reviewers. Does it mean the work will be Article submitted后（即paper提交后）： 1、awaiting admin. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". 04. This change has occurred I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Now, it is in the “Awaiting Reviewers Selection” mode once again. Once enough reviewers have been selected, • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. Hot Network Questions Anyone give me some advice: I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Usually, it is not a single reviewer, but several reviewers. Did the editor find new reviewers for me? Show Review in Original Language 4. I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. Jul 15, 2019 · 1 Answer to this question. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. ’ Awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks after peer review process . After submission, the status changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. At this point, reviewers should also be sent an email or letter letting them know the outcome of their review. Choose Minor Revision when you feel the paper should be accepted after slight revisions. 薛蛮蛮 2022-08-31 Later, I submitted my online application and received a confirmation e-mail after 2 days stating that my paper has passed the initial screening and it is now awaiting reviewer selection. 10 AE reviewing, Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022. It is usual for a paper to go through at least two author revisions before acceptance. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. Awaiting Editor Decision. I submitted a manuscript to a journal using scholarone manuscript system, and later got a decision of major revision. The process of reviewer selection in S1M is quite straightforward. contained. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. It is just guessing. This change has occurred You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. Also, ‘SAE’ perhaps stands for ‘Specialist Associate Editor. Ah well! – MHL. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". 06. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" The ScholarOne system is set up to automatically close revision submissions after a month but can manually be re-opened for you. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. I submitted the revised manuscript after one-and-a-half months. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Recall that AEs of most journals are volunteers who have other jobs, go on trips, and have many other responsibilities, so it's not uncommon for a paper to sit in someone's The second update, Awaiting Referee Selection, means that the manuscript has completed the internal check and is now awaiting peer review. The submission is now with the author. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. Thank you. similar reviews from two different accounts for the same manuscript) What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. But I don't think that's the right way of thinking about it. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. After 28 days, it changed to "awaiting reviewer confirmation". e. I made all the required amendments and submit again. g. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. I sent an email in between to inquire about it, and the editor-in-chief asked the associate editor in charge of my manuscript to reply to me, but there has The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Then I revised and resubmitted. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your AE stands for Associate Editor. Minor revisions should be verified by the AE and not sent back to the reviewers. However, after we made the revisions, the manuscript status changed to "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. I submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses the ScholarOne system. Follow asked Feb 17, 2021 at 13:39. links. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. This change has occurred I submitted my manuscript to a journal. I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. The status is remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but After the minor revision was uploaded, it has been showing "awaiting reviewer invitation". The Great The Great. But, quickly after this, the status changed to “awaiting EIC decision” within 2 weeks and is stuck at that for 3 weeks. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. So if the editor started to search for an additional reviewer after receiving the first two reviewer reports, everything seems quite in time. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no further comments. 24 Major revision (3 reviewers, 18 comments) After making revisions for nearly a month, the paper was accepted in the second review. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. Improve this question. It has been over two months, but the status is still displayed as Hi. We request that Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2020-04-29 10:10:55 I agreed with the opinions of the above posters: 1. Does this indicate rejection? Meaning of Awaiting EIC Decision for over 20 days Dears I submitted a paper, after 4 months I received major revisions from 2 reviewers. " Does it mean that my paper will go through After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Your article has now received the minimum number of reviews required to make a decision. comments and decide the next steps for the manuscript i. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? 2. Additionally, after the revised manuscript is returned, each author will receive an email requesting supplementary information 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation Re-submitted after revision on 7. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. This I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. This change has occurred The reviewing process starts when editors send the paper to the first suitable reviewer, and ends when final review is complete. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. Commented Apr 19, 2018 at 17:25. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Therefore, it might be prudent to wait a bit longer. 18 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2022. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. Awaiting reviewer score, it has been sent out to selected reviewers and is still awaiting for their scores (comments). Click the blue “Take Action” checkmark. 2022. If you'd like to go ahead with the withdrawal, you will need to write to the journal with a withdrawal request, which is signed by all authors. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Revisions Authors who receive a decision of Minor Revision or Major Revision have 20, and 40 days, respectively, to resubmit the revised manuscript. However, If the required changes were very minimal (e. It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. are. " I had a revision decision, and after I submitted the revision, the status went to "Under review", and after about 4 weeks, it has now changed to "Awaiting reviewer scores". The Editor will determine if additional input is needed from reviewers. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 15 answers. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-11-14 21:00:17 9. Q: How can I decide whether my suspicion is correct? What handling times I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. if the manuscript needs to A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). What does this mean? Will it go for review? EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 22. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. 23, major revision on 10. 14 submitted 9. A first round of peer review might take up to 8 weeks easily and finding reviewers also needs time. This change has occurred This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Receiving the first decision. And until now, the status has not changed for two months. Hooray for graduation! The whole process is as follows (I forgot to record a few steps, but it didn't have a I submitted a paper to a journal that used scholarone and the reviewers recommended a major revision. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. , choice of language, punctuation), it is likely that the editor will make the final decision. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. automated. 18 Submit for review after major revision 2. Review Settings . Thank you for your info I was suspiciously pessimistic as well when it went from 'referee selection' to 'awaiting decision'. Is switching a reviewer after minor revision common? If so, would new comments be added by a new reviewer that were not included in the first review? A major revision was submitted to a journal. It has been over two weeks, but the status is still displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Please note that manuscripts are removed from Manuscripts Awaiting Revision once the revision due date has passed. Since then the status changed to "awaiting referee scores" then a bit later to "awaiting recommendation", which was the status for about two weeks, and a few days ago it changed back to "awaiting referee scores". You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. One reviewer suggested to accepts it as is, the second didn't give a response. completed. (‘Referee’ is another term for ‘peer reviewer. Also, Hi. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. ’ How much more time should I wait for a response? The status change from “awaiting referee selection” to “awaiting ED decision” means that peer reviewers were selected to review your manuscript and have sent their comments to the journal editor, who will now have to take the final decision on your manuscript (Accept, Revise, or Reject). What can this mean? The platform is Awaiting Reviewer Selection. This is a placeholder queue that does not require check these manuscripts periodically • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. ’) So, great, that’s one step cleared in the submission/publication process! Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. . What could be What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Submitted on 11. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Awaiting Reviewer Selection: After the manuscript was reformatted as per their 2. 11. email. After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. The Editor will take into After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. This change has occurred Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Decision: Major Revision 24-03-08: Revision Submit 24-03-08: Awaiting Reviewers Selection 24-03-18: Awaiting Reviewers Scores 24-03-30: Awaiting AE Recommendation 24-04-07: Awaiting Decision 24-04-07: Decision: Accept Show Review in Original Language 2023-4-25 awaiting reviewer selection 2023-4-25 in peer review process 2023-4-29 awaiting reviewer scores 2023-7-18 awaiting final decision 2023-9-4 accept This journal requires no more than 15 figures and tables. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. Paper under review a second time without After the status 'Awaiting reviewer scores,' the status changed to 'Revision,' and the status is still active. This change has occurred Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. The journal told me previously that this review process might take from 4-6 months. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 changes of status now). May I know is there any chances for at least to get a major revision. The decision letter is delivered to the author via email. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. 21 Awaiting reviewer assignment 10. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. For most manuscripts, in the first round of review, usually two peer reviewers are selected. 05 Awaiting AE recommendation Awaiting Reviewer Selection 1 day - Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2 months - Awaiting Reviewer Scores 1 month and 5 days - Major Revision 1 day - Abstract. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. What does "awaiting reviewer selection" really mean under the "minor revision" scenario? 4. Does it happen that the editor asks the reviewers to re-review a paper? For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. gmq ggkyb wuw lowurh cskyuh uhco stoerh ddmx wuouhb muvnnw